
That Company Internet Marketing Review open_in_new
Our Review
That Company Internet Marketing Review: A Rigid White-Label Provider with Major Transparency Issues
Introduction
That Company Internet Marketing is a white-label digital marketing provider that offers SEO, paid ads, and other online marketing services to agencies worldwide. With over 250+ agencies relying on their backend support, they claim expertise across multiple industries. However, based on customer feedback, their inflexible processes, lack of transparency, and unwillingness to adapt raise serious concerns about their suitability for agencies that value collaboration and accountability.
Pros and Cons of That Company Internet Marketing
1. Lack of Transparency & Communication
đ« Major Red Flags Reported by Customers
- No Direct Access to Client-Facing Teams â Agencies were denied meetings with the actual team handling their campaigns, making it impossible to build trust or clarify strategies.
- Outdated Project Management System â Their proprietary system is described as clunky, non-integrated (no Slack/Asana support), and inefficient.
- Slow Response to Basic Needs â It reportedly took four years just to implement meeting reminders, signaling poor adaptability.
Customer Quote:
"They flat-out refused to allow meetings with their client-facing leads. If Iâm trusting my clients and reputation with your team, I need to know who they areânot just take your word for it."
2. Inflexible, One-Size-Fits-All Approach
đ No Customization or Adaptability
- Rigid Workflows â They refuse to modify reporting, processes, or campaign strategies, even when requested.
- No Performance Guarantees â Unlike competitors, they donât stand behind their work, leaving agencies at risk.
- Forced Compliance â Agencies must fully adopt their outdated system with no alternatives.
Customer Quote:
"Their attitude is: âThis is how we do things, and if it doesnât work for you, too bad.â If you want flexibility? Look elsewhere."
3. Poor Accountability & Quality Control
â Mistakes Caught by Clients, Not Them
- Geo-Targeting Errors in Ads â Some clients reported major targeting mistakes that were caught by the agency, not That Company.
- No Clear Escalation Process â If something goes wrong, thereâs no structured way to resolve issues.
- Defensive Instead of Solution-Oriented â When questioned, they dismiss concerns rather than addressing them professionally.
Customer Quote:
"They act like theyâre doing you a favor by allowing you to work with them. Thatâs not how business works. Iâm bringing you clients, revenue, and long-term growthâyou need to prove youâre worthy of that trust."
4. Arrogant & Dismissive Client Relations
đ Unwilling to Answer Legitimate Questions
- Labeling Questions as "Radical" â Agencies asking about processes, guarantees, or transparency were told they "werenât a good fit."
- No Willingness to Improve â Instead of refining their approach, they blame agencies for expecting accountability.
Customer Quote:
"They decided we âwerenât a good fitâ because I asked too many âserious procedural questions.â Thatâs not partnershipâthatâs arrogance."
Final Verdict: Should You Work with That Company Internet Marketing?
â Avoid If You Need:
â Transparency (No direct team access)
â Customization (Rigid workflows)
â Accountability (No performance guarantees)
â Modern Tools (No Slack/Asana integration)
â Consider If You:
- Want a hands-off, no-questions-asked provider.
- Donât mind lack of control over campaigns.
- Are okay with potential errors going unchecked.
Bottom Line: That Company Internet Marketing operates like an assembly lineânot a true partner. If you value transparency, flexibility, and accountability, look elsewhere. Their refusal to adapt and dismissive attitude make them a high-risk choice for serious agencies.
Contact Company
Minimum Price
$1000
Hourly Rate
$150 - $199
Employees